More evidence of nonviolent protest superiority. Creative research on resistance method and effect on US Congressional policy support:
Are peaceful or violent protests more effective at achieving policy change? I study the effect of protests during the Civil Rights Era on legislator votes in the US House. Using a fixed-effects specification, my identifying variation is changes within the congressional district over time. I find that peaceful protests made legislators vote more liberally, consistent with the goals of the Civil Rights Movement. By contrast, violent protests backfired and made legislators vote more conservatively. The effect of peaceful protests was limited to civil rights-related votes. The effect of violent protests extended to welfare-related votes. I explore alternative explanations for these results and show that the results are robust to them. Congressional districts where incumbents were replaced responded more strongly. Furthermore, congressional districts with a larger population share of whites responded more strongly. This is consistent with a signaling model of protests where protests transmitted new information to white voters but not to black voters.
That is the abstract of the job market paper of Gábor Nyéki from Duke.
Repost from the always great Marginal Revolution
Undertold history of the black press in US. Informative, inspiring, well done.
Discussion by Columbia Journalism Review of the decision by the New York Times to publish the anonymous op-ed from someone inside the Trump Administration.
Shirky: The Political Power of Social Media.Foreign Affairs(2011)
Morozov: Picking a fight with Clay Shirky: Foreign Policy(2011)
Edge: Digital power and it’s discontents (2010)
Prospect: How dictators watch us on the web (2009)
Prospect: The net advantage (2009)
Can social media conversations contribute to productive outcomes? Yale students tried. (Vanity Fair)
But this being 2017, a familiar drama began. A student posted an image of the flyer on Overheard at Yale, an intra-college Facebook group with over 20,000 members and one of the grand student hubs on campus. The “Reform the Savages” announcement was peppered with inane jokes about colonialism, and capped with a picture of a generic Native American chieftain in a headdress. The Party’s chairman, Quinn Shepherd, attempted to apologize, in private, to the Association of Native Americans at Yale, but the overture was rejected, according to a screenshot of the conversation posted by the student.(“So can we apologize…. but like in /private/[?]” The student described the interaction.) Within minutes, the comments section exploded.
A compelling argument that part of the problem with tech and social media infrastructure is that those who create and control it do not have any background in liberal arts.
It never seems to have occurred to them that their advertising engines could also be used to deliver precisely targeted ideological and political messages to voters. Hence the obvious question: how could such smart people be so stupid? The cynical answer is they knew about the potential dark side all along and didn’t care, because to acknowledge it might have undermined the aforementioned licenses to print money…
So what else could explain the astonishing naivety of the tech crowd? My hunch is it has something to do with their educational backgrounds.
Richard Sennett discusses the use of space that contributed to the political richness of ancient Athens and suggests modern designers could follow suit.
“Difference” today seems about identity — we think of race, gender, or class. Aristotle’s meant something more by difference; he included also the experience of doing different things, of acting in divergent ways which do not neatly fit together. The mixture in a city of action as well as identity is the foundation of its distinctive politics.